Back to Random stuff

Moral philosophy: logical classification

One root. One discriminator at each branch. Distinct values among siblings. Search covers the cross-cutting thinkers, concepts, arguments, and cases that do not belong in a strict tree.

Rule of construction

Let C(v) be the children of an internal node v. Define one discriminator fv: C(v) → Vv. Require cicjfv(ci) ≠ fv(cj). The selected node gives the discriminator, values, scope, and sources.

Method: this is a rule-based classification, not factor analysis. SEP supports the local distinctions. No single SEP article asserts the entire tree.

SEP basis: Moral Phenomenology distinguishes second-order metaethics from first-order normative ethics, then divides normative ethics into general theory and applied inquiry. Moral Theory explains why several familiar theory families are useful but rough. The map keeps rough or cross-cutting material out of exact sibling partitions.

Logical classification tree

The small line in each box is that child’s value under the parent discriminator.

Select a box to open or close its branch. Keyboard: ↑ parent, ↓ child, ← → siblings.

Swipe sideways to see the rest of a wide branch.

Moral philosophy: logical classification

SEP

Definition

Explanation

Examples
Objections
SEP references